Online Insurance Quotes

Showing posts with label Compare Life Insurance Policies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Compare Life Insurance Policies. Show all posts

Monday, October 29, 2012

HDFC Standard Life Launches New Immediate Annuity Plan

The market for immediate annuity plan is gaining new ground in India. Although traditionally insurance companies in India have more number of deferred annuity plans, the trend is set to change. At least this is what HDFC standard Life Insurance feels as they prepare to launch their new immediate annuity plan in December 2012. They have already received the IRDA approval for this new product – HDFC New Immediate Annuity Plan.

Executive Vice President (Marketing and Direct Channels) , Sanjay Tripathy feels that there is a lot of potential for growth of Immediate Annuity Plans  in India as their presence in the international market are already established. The new product will offer 11 annuity options for single and joint lives.
An Immediate Annuity Plan start paying you annuity right from day one once a lump sum payment is made. These are typically suitable for people aged above 50 years and having huge disposable income. Some of the immediate annuity plans are LIC Jeevan Akshay, ICICI Pru Immediate Annuity etc.
As opposed to Immediate Annuity Plan, Deferred Annuity Plans have an accumulation phase inbuilt in itself. Premiums are paid for X number of years and post retirement the investor starts receiving pension income. These are quite popular in India and some examples are LIC Jeevan Tarand, LIC Jeevan Nidhi, Bajaj Allianz Swarna Rakhsha etc. 



Looking for Life Insurance? Click below to get the best deals :



Monday, October 15, 2012

Postal Life Insurance and Rural Postal Life Insurance initiates improvements in their schemes.



While the whole insurance industry is buzzing with competitive products and expensive promotions, the Postal Life Insurance (PLI) and the Rural Postal Life Insurance (RPLI) are working their way to glory. At least that’s what the statistics show. The PLI was introduced in the year 1884 and the RPLI was introduced 1995. These schemes are only available to Government and Semi government employees. The contract is guaranteed by the Government of India and it enjoys high bonus for a lesser premiums.   The RPLI is implemented in the rural areas.

Many technological and administrative steps are taken towards making the two insurance schemes attractive to the customers. As many as 6,000 Gramin Dak Sevaks and 1,000 Direct Agents are contributing to service procurement and taking care of hundreds and thousands of customers. Now, all the after-sales services including maturity and loan cases are handled by local divisions. Policy documents are now printed and submitted to the insurants within 30 days. Facilities that the customers can now avail of include enhanced life cover of up to Rs 20 lakh, online premium deposit for a policy in any Post Office anywhere in the country, option of a variety of products, easier revival process and customers’ care centres at Divisions, Regions and Circles to take prompt care of grievances.  Nomination change, transfer, assignment facilities can be availed at Circle/Regional office level.

These implementations would hopefully bring in more revenue from these Government Initiatives. Statistical Data from the website also shows that RPLI is gaining better ground in terms of growth. Without any promotion, these two schemes are silently adding substantial revenue to the Indian Government.





Looking for Life Insurance? Click below to get the best deals :



Monday, July 11, 2011

SBI launches Flexi Smart Insurance

SBI Life, the joint venture between State Bank of India and BNP Paribas, has launched a new Variable Insurance Product (VIP) called the Flexi Smart Insurance. Under this the customer would pay a minimum premium of Rs 1500 per month to subscribe and with the flexibility to pay premiums at yearly, half yearly, quarterly or monthly. This premium is liable to earn an interim interest of 7% during 2011-2012 apart from the additional interest rate declared at the end of the financial year.

VIPs were earlier known as Universal Linked Plan. Earlier IRDA issued a new guideline to change its name to VIP and also asserted that these products be offered only on non-unit lined products. SBI Life is the first to introduce VIP with the launch of Bima Account Number 2. The Flexi Smart Insurance is their second offering so far.

The VIP offers choices across different levels of risk exposure. It can also provide stable returns and safe investments for the risk-averse customers. The key feature is that it gives the customer to vary the assured amount as well as premium payment.

Sunday, July 3, 2011

IRDA's guidelines on IPO of Life Insurance companies.

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has asked for feedback and recommendations on their newly proposed guideline formally called The IRDA (“Issues of Capital and Disclosure Requirements for Life Insurance Companies”) Regulations, 2011. The guideline maintains that the life insurance companies in India wishing to go public must have spent at least 10 years in the business and have must showed a satisfactory profit record in the past six quarters. In simple words it would consider only the frontrunners in this business. Currently only two insurance companies, viz. ICICI Prudential and HDFC Standard Life Insurance, meet the 10 year eligibility criteria. However if they wish to raise an IPO, they have to first get the approval nod from IRDA and only then can they approach SEBI. Apart from the tenure and profitability, the IRDA would also consider the company specific risk factors and the transparency of the company’s disclosures before they give the final nod.

In a way the new guideline provides security to the common man because it shall endorse only those companies who are serious in this business and have done well. While on one side it provides security, on the flip side it handicaps an important business aspect of the life insurance companies. The Section 6A of the Life Insurance Act allowed transfer of share below 5 % without the approval of any regulator. But if this new guideline comes into effect, it shall override this benefit for a period of 10 years. Keeping all other aspects aside this can prove to be a direct hit on the mergers and would lay the platform for a highly competitive life insurance business.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

HDFC Life to defer IPO plans

IRDA would be coming out with the IPO norms for insurance companies in the next few days. Insurance companies which have completed 10 years of operation would be able to tap the equity markets for fund raising. HDFC Life , one of the earliest private entrants, would be eligible to tap the equity markets. 

In an obvious and expected move, the company has mentioned that it will defer the IPO plans till at least next year as the current valuations are not attractive at all. Profitability is under pressure and the life industry is set to record a degrowth this year. In the light of the new regulations on ULIPs with lower charges and lower commissions, the life insurance industry has been recording lower sales and the margins have come under intense pressure.

However, we feel that the current changes brought about will strengthen the life insurance industry in the long run, and it very well addresses the systemic flaws in the system. The industry will emerge the healthier for it in the long run, and ultimately will lead to higher valuations for the life insurance industry. The same cannot be said about the general insurance industry where the public insurance companies are operating at a combined ratio of 135! There are systemic problems there among the non life public sector companies which needs to be urgently addressed.


Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Life Insurance : ULIPs vs Traditional Products

Until end of August this year, the bulk of the life insurance products sold by insurance companies was ULIPs (Unit Linked Insurance Plans). Almost 70% of the new business premium earned by the life insurance companies was through ULIPs. The entire life insurance distribution machinery touted ULIPs as the ideal investment cum insurance product. While ULIPs were the flavour of the reason, there was a slightly unfortunate reason for them being pushed so much by the distributors- and that was because ULIPs had very high commissions for the person who was selling it, sometimes as high as 70% of the first year premium. Policy administration charges were high, surrender penalty was exorbitant and mis-selling was rampant. And finally, the cookie crumbled- first SEBI came down heavily saying it had a right to regulate ULIPs because they were essentially mutual funds masquerading as Insurance, and then IRDA cracked the whip laying down stringent criteria for the ULIPs. Commission were reduced,  charges were minimized, and overall transparency was improved. In an ideal world, ULIPs became a great product for the consumer. But we do not live in an ideal world.  While the ULIPs of today are far more aligned to customer interests, we find that there is no zeal and fervour to sell them on the part of the distributors. The very agents who were pushing ULIPs down the throat of unsuspecting customers do not consider ULIPS as the flavour of the season anymore. They have now fallen back upon the traditional products where IRDA has not laid down any guidelines for commission level.
Thus we find that traditional products sales have suddenly taken off. This is primarily because these products now allow the insurance agents and distributors to earn their fat commissions, and not because suddenly traditional products are better for customers than ULIPs. On the contrary, today, a ULIP is a great savings and insurance product.

If we look at the data coming out, we see that 50% of Reliance Life’s product sales are now traditional products, whereas a year ago, only 15% was through traditional products. Birla SunLife now generates 30% of their premium through ULIPS as compared to only 8% through ULIPs a year earlier. In the case of ING Vysya Life insurance, only 10% of their sale is through ULIPs now. All the insurers narrate the same story about how they are trying to reduce their reliance on ULIPs . But the real reason for the decreased importance of ULIPs is because the insurer can not pay enough commissions on ULIPs to keep the distributors happy due to the IRDA guidelines. And thus, they are resorting to selling traditional products. So next time, your friendly neighborhood agent espouses the virtues of a traditional life insurance product, do know that the real reason for the promotion is something completely different!

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Claims payment record of the Private Insurance Companies

As we know, there are 20 odd private life insurance companies in India, and there is LIC which is a public sector company. LIC is the 800 pound gorilla, managing to hold on to about 75% market share even 10 years after private companies have been allowed into the life insurance space. The private life insurance companies position themselves on being more customer friendly, wider array of products etc while LIC holds on to its positioning of trust, experience and government backing. One of the key parameters on which to judge a life insurance company is their claims payment record. At the same time, we must note that given that life insurance has become more of  a savings and investment product, the returns that they provide are perhaps more important than claims payout ratios. Nevertheless, claims record is definitely not a variable to be ignored.

 
A table illustrating the claims rejection percentages of the top life insurance companies in 2009-10 is presented below:

Life Insurance Company
Claims rejection ratio (%)


LIC
1.21%
Aviva
9.75%
Bajaj Allianz
5.2%
Birla SunLife
10.62%
HDFC Life
4.67%
ICICI Prudential
3.27%
ING Vysya
4.26%
Kotak Mahindra
4.29%
Max New York Life
12.31%
MetLife
5.94%
Reliance Life
7.05%
SBI Life
14.75%
Tata AIG
12.3%

An important observation from the above table is that the claims rejection ratio of LIC is the lowest, thus implying that their record is the best as far as claims payment is concerned. At the same time, the very high percentage of claims rejection of SBI Life and Max  New York Life surely comes in as a surprise.

It must however be noted once again that in Unit Linked products that life insurance companies promote aggressively (or at least was promoting till Sep 2010) , the returns earned on the fund is perhaps a more important variable than the claims payment (or rejection) ratio. However, for non life insurance companies, which offer pure protection/insurance products with no savings or investment component, claims payment is the crucial variable along with the speed of processing of claims.

Let us now look at the incurred claims ratios of the non life insurance companies:


Non Life Insurance Company
Incurred claims ratio


New India Assurance
89%
Oriental Insurance
99.69%
United India Insurance
78.62%
National Insurance
99.16%
Royal Sundaram
68.95%
Reliance  General Insurance
77.3%
Iffco Tokio Insurance
83.44%
Tata AIG
60.54%
ICICI Lombard
85.35%
Bajaj Allianz
71.9%
HDFC Ergo
80.73%
Bharti Axa
104%%

One data point that stands out from above is that Tata AIG General Insurance seems to be sourcing the best quality business from the underwriting point of view, whereas the claims payment ratio of Bharti Axa seems to be quite high. Alo,the claims payment ratio of the public insurers, at an overall level, is higher than that of the private non life insurers.



Friday, August 20, 2010

Life Insurance Policies might get cheaper: Reduced mortality charges

Typically, a life insurance policy has two components- protection and savings/investments. IRDA , through their latest guidelines on ULIPs have ensured that the various charges on the savings/investment component of the life insurance policy will become cheaper. But now, a further change is on its way which will benefit policyholders- the mortality charge , ie the premium that a person pays for the life cover- might also reduce.

In India, mortality charges have primarily been defined by the 1994-96 LIC table. For example, the probability of death of a 40 year old was taken as approximately 2 per thousand while that of a 60 year old was taken at about 13 per thousand. Since then, life expectancy has gone up . Data has been collected from LIC and the private insurers and this has been submitted to IRDA. Actuarial departments indicate that the death rates may have come down by 20-25 % in the higher age bracket. This might lead to a reduction of 15-20% in the mortality charges. The new tables has been prepared and takes the variables of gender , age and geography into account. Earlier, the tables only considered gender and age.

The reduction in mortality charges might not be uniform across segments. Our view is that premiums for younger people will reduce more, for middle aged people it would be less changed, and the jump in premium that we used to see for higher age brackets would reduce.

The impact of this reduced charges might be seen most in pure term policies. However, many private insurance companies had started following their own mortality tables and had reduced the premiums for pure term policies aggressively. In the light of the new change brought about by IRDA where life insurance policies have a minimum sum assured of 10 or 7 times the annual premium, this impact will also be felt on the ULIPs which are extremely popular in the market. For traditional policies, the impact could be in the form of a higher declared bonus rates.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Online Insurance Comparison

The internet today is the most vast source of information. Information is almost commoditised , the only important thing being that one should know what to search for. The greatest role of the internet has been in removing information asymmetry, leading to a more efficient marketplace.

And insurance is one area where the power of information through the internet can be harnessed to the maximum. One of the biggest gripes about the insurance industry has been that users have been purchasing insurance almost blindfolded, completely at the mercy of the agent who unabashedly pushes products where he earns the maximum commission. The costs of distribution in insurance are massive, and there are significant inefficiencies within the system. As with any other channel where commissions are unrealistically high, there are many layers and sub layers of distribution, the ultimate cost of which is borne by the consumer. This is where the internet can step in, getting the buyer and the insurance company much closer, and thus ultimately leading to lower purchase price.


In India, the recent trend has been that people have started using the internet extensively to compare policies before buying insurance. Insurance purchase through the internet is still in its infancy, but it is a matter of time before things catch up. With broadband penetration set to surge beyond the current levels of 10 mn connections, the use of the internet can only increase. The efficiency that the internet has brought in is primarily in terms of allowing the user to compare all features of the insurance company including price through the individual websites of the companies or through aggregator sites. In that sense, there is a tremendous responsibility on aggregator sites to provide unbiased information. Whether that is happening or not is a different matter altogether. The level of mis-selling that is there in insurance is of epic proportions. Regular premium policies have been sold as recurring bank deposits, non guaranteed products have been sold as guaranteed products, direct debit mandates have been taken from unsuspecting consumers...even if the internet can reduce the level of mis-selling a bit, it would have more than served its purpose.

The important factor to note in any price comparison of insurance policies is that the savings through lower premium is not only for a year, but this benefit is passed on every year on renewal. A health insurance policy bought at a 40% lower price than a policy of another company is likely to cost 40% less on each subsequent renewal. The power of accumulated savings is thus huge, as we can see.

At the same time, there is one disturbing trend that is being seen in aggregator sites. We are seeing that products which frankly do not merit comparisons are being compared. A case in point is pensions product, where the variable with perhaps more than 90% weightage is fund performance of the company. Yet we still find aggregator sites providing comparisons using the assumed rate of return of 6% and 10 %. A .25% lower fund management fee of one company is irrelevant if it underperforms the fund performance of another company cumulatively by even 1%.

Insurance products that lend itself the best to online insurance comparison are health insurance, car insurance and term life insurance. This is primarily because there is a direct price comparison, and there are direct feature comparisons. Additional features can be attributed a monetary value, and the user can then do an analysis whether the overall price equation makes sense. Products like child policies, pensions, or for those matter investment products are very difficult to compare on the price front, and more often than not the comparisons are meaningless.